Many students at my school did not pass last year’s
STAAR Writing EOC. This, to me, seems to be a performance problem that could be
improved with non-instructional solutions. I know that these students are
receiving writing instruction. In fact, these struggling students have been put in
special intervention classes where they may be pulled by their ELA teachers for
additional individualized instruction. I cannot judge whether the student’s ELA
instruction is in need of improvement, but as a librarian, I see several other
solutions for improving writing scores based upon library programs. (Studies
have shown that the more a student reads, the better a writer he or she
becomes.)
- Students might be offered incentives to read more.
- Students must be provided with the time to read materials of their own choosing.
- Students must be provided with engaging reading materials and information sources in both print and digital formats.
- Students must be provided with the time and encouragement to produce and communicate their own unique ideas in less high-stake settings.
- Students must receive adequate feedback on these products of their ideas.
- Students must have access to adult leaders who model the behaviors of reading and writing.
Define performance support systems and explain how a
performance support system might (or might not) help solve the problem you
identified above.
In chapter 15 of the text, Nyugen defines performance
support as “a system that provides performers with varying levels of access to
support information and tools at the moment of need.”
I imagine a computer software or device app performance
support system to help students improve their writing skills as having the
following capabilities:
- It would allow access to examples of well written materials with clear annotations throughout on as to why it is considered so.
- It would provide tools for planning written work.
- It would offer writing critiques, grammar pop-ups, and other suggestions for correcting one’s work.
- It would provide links to additional external writing help.
If such a program does exist, I think that a performance
support system would not be a fix-all, but would be one of many interventions
that could be used to increase the level of performance of our student writers.
In fact, Nyugen (2009) suggests that performance support systems be used for
low frequency and non-critical tasks. I believe that being able to write well
is high frequency and very critical, especially when tied to performance on
high stakes testing.
If we were to rely too heavily on a writing performance
support system, we might find that it acts as a crutch, and when that support
is removed and students must work alone with no outside aid on the STAAR EOC,
they may not perform well. It is for this reason that I would be hesitant to
implement such a support system for anything other than a training support
tool, and at that, it should be used in conjunction with classroom ELA writing
instruction and several of the other proposed library program interventions
mentioned above.
by Laraine Languell
What knowledge would help solve the problem you identified
above and how would that knowledge need to be collected and managed to help
facilitate problem solving?
In chapter 16, Rosenberg discusses four types of knowledge:
explicit, tacit, common, and undiscovered. In the above presented problem of
students failing the STAAR EOC Writing exam, I would want to understand what
knowledge that high performing writers have that struggling writers do not. I
believe that the characteristic that sets the high performers apart may be that
they hold more tacit knowledge, or the knowledge of experience. The skills of
writing must be developed over time. I believe that the more experience we have
in reading well written text, and in creating our own written products, the
more our writing skills develop. This experience leads to a better feel for
grammar, syntax, and the overall written flow of ideas. We begin to emulate the
style of well written texts that we have read and begin to develop and perfect
our own unique style of writing.
It would certainly be a challenge to make this type of tacit
knowledge explicit and commonly known, but attempting knowledge management
could benefit developing or struggling writers. This undertaking becomes more
feasible when we understand and work within the components of knowledge
management: codification, collaboration, and access.
Much of what we know about writing skills has already been
codified in innumerable resources over grammar, punctuation, creative writing,
different styles and forms of writing, planning written work, etc. The studying
of such resources has its benefits to the developing writer. However, as
previously mentioned, I believe that writing skill comes much from experience.
Experience comes from exposure to well written literature and experience in
creating one’s own written works. Experience and tacit knowledge can also be
shared by means of the collaboration component of knowledge management.
Students and teacher could accomplish this by discussing written works, sharing
one’s own written works with others, critiquing and offering feedback on the
work of others, and by promoting these types of collaborative exchanges in a
non-intimidating environment.
Access to information is also a key component of knowledge
management. As a librarian, I facilitate access to information. One way of
doing so is to provide well organized resources in both print and digital
format. The school library’s website serves as a portal for organized access of
information and resources. This portal links to our online catalog into which
our print, multimedia, and electronic resources have been cataloged according
to the standards of the Dewey Decimal Classification System to enable easy and
predictable retrieval. Through the systematic creation of bibliographies,
patrons may search for online resources and production tools by topic or type
from the library website as well. The library website is a portal to the K-12
Online Databases. The website might also serve as a portal to web 2.0 tools
that may facilitate the type of collaborative exchange of knowledge described
above. The library strives for equitable access to information, so restrictions
on who may access the information and when it may be accessed, should ideally
be nonexistent. I am excited to be a librarian because the library is the hub
of knowledge management. The valuable information and resources within the
library must be promoted to our learning community so that we might learn to
better use these resources to solve problems by means of access to knowledge
and ideas.
What informal learning experiences have you participated in?
Could those informal learning experiences be shared with others? Could the
knowledge gained in those settings be codified and managed? Should it be
managed or should the informal experiences be replicated or broadened for
others?
Informal learning is a continuous experience in our lives,
often driven by interest and curiosity. For those things in which we are most
interested, we seek information, immersion, and experience. I can think of many
examples of informal learning in my own life. My undergraduate degree is in
Spanish education. I am not a native speaker, so I had to learn Spanish as a
teenager and adult. Much of the fluency that I have gained has been through
informal learning- authentic conversation with other Spanish speakers. Although
it can be difficult for foreign language educators to replicate a truly
authentic language experience in the classroom, the knowledge gained through
authentic conversation can be somewhat codified and shared with language
students. Educators and instructional designers can accomplish this through
long-distance communication with other Spanish speakers via phone, Skype, and
web 2.0 tools, through watching and listening to Spanish multimedia, and
through true immersion experiences of visiting Spanish speaking communities.
These forms of informal learning have helped me personally in forming my
knowledge of the Spanish language. I also experience numerous opportunities for
informal learning on a vast number of topics throughout my daily life. When we
encourage students to see these informal experiences as ways of developing
knowledge, we are helping them to truly become life-long learners.
1. I love your different perspectives on how students can improve on the STAAR exams. Allowing them to be more selective will sharpen their context skills and allowing more feedback will give them the direction they need to conquer their writing weaknesses.
ReplyDelete2. Performance support that provides additional links to give the student a further connection with the information is great. I love the idea of giving the student the reason "why it is considered well written text.
3. I agree that tacit knowledge is very important to becoming or achieving great writing skills. The creativity has somehow decreased in the curriculum and that sense of imagination is what helps us to keep adding to the writing process. Library information management has changed dramatically since our high school days and the navigation of information is much easier for students than searching through thousands of index cards in the 90's.
4. Learning spanish in high school was a very detailed experience for me. I could remember how to conjugate the verbs and do my assignments with ease, but when in a spanish environment i would freeze up. When thrown in a situation where native spanish is spoken the classroom didnt teach and we would have prospered from the exposure.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe problem you identified and the non-instructional solutions are right on the mark for a issue that plagues many schools and districts. I know the amount of time my wife spent with my kids at the library over many summers paid off for them. Many of the solutions listed were applied to their experience.
ReplyDeleteYou also listed some great attributes of a support system for writing. I only differ on one point you made as I think it should be poured on them lavishly without much concern of it being a crutch. In fact, I would probably eliminate the word crutch and use the word tool instead. I work in a field where business communication is the lifeblood of the organization. The utilization of tools is an expected behavior.
I like the comic you made but I believe that as students develop a proficiency in writing and spelling, they will rely on the tools less and less. I wonder if the reluctance to provide the tools prevent a proliferation of resources explained in your posting. Take for instance, my daughter in college, she would benefit from such aids to help point out and direct better writing for her classes. I believe we have an intrinsic motivation to create on our own and without the help of such tools. That motivation is what keeps it from being a life long crutch.
Your perspective as a librarian is helpful to all of us in this class. You are also on target to state that the library should be a portal to information and resources that are helpful to the student. Libraries will have to change and adapt to meet the needs of the patrons if they want to remain relevant.
Regarding informal learning, I too believe that life-long learning is accomplished by informal learning. Consider the training we have through the masters program. It is not possible to learn everything we need to be a master of education technology. However we do have enough time to learn how to learn. We learned about resources and methods to seek other resources. If students leave high school with the notion that they have what they need, or if they leave college with the same notion, the education system has truly let them down. The pattern of learning is what should be instilled by the replication of informal learning methods.
I'm reminded of a statement that a graduation speaker said a few years ago. Paraphrased as "now that you have received your degree, you can finally get to the business of learning!"
I completely agree that we learn best through experience and immersion! My best friend is from Iran, and I watched much of her family learn English from shows like Seasame Street, and some of the adults even learned by watcing Soap Operas. :)
ReplyDeleteI always use this example to my students, when encouraging them to study by physically writing summaries of my notes:
Before a teenager begins to drive, he or she rides in the car with various of people to many different places. The might go from one place to another a couple times, even. But whenever they get their drivers lisence, the get behind the wheel, and do not know how to get to the place they have been many times before. I believe this is because they did not actually do the driving before; instead, they relied on the driver to get them to the places they needed to go and did not pay a lot of attention as to how they got there. But once they drive to the place themselves, they are more likely to remember the next time how they got there, since they actively took part in the driving proess.
Great post!
That brings back a memory from my first driving experiences. I could tell you how to get somewhere when I was riding along with my folks. I could even recite the instructions whenever I wanted.
DeleteOnce I got behind the wheel, all that knowledge escaped my brain and It took a while before I could finally recall my *mapsco-like* knowledge.
I think this happens to students all the time when they are introduced to something new, or they think they are being introduced to something new, they forget about those connections to what they already know.